TTS AAR: Britcon Game 1: Venetians vs Zanj Revolt

My first tournament game at Briton this year was against John’s Zanj Revolt army: hordes of fanatical warriors who would keep fighting at full capacity no matter how many times you disorder them. My troops were missing the canals 0f Venice already!

As the Zanj had no cavalry, I won the scouting, and was pleased to see the enemy drawn up in what looked like a defensive posture to me. The last thing I had wanted was to face an unbroken wall of foot units stretching right the way across the table, so the open flank on one side of the Zanj formation seemed like an opportunity to be exploited.

I duly advanced my infantry slightly forward in the centre (always give yourself a little retreat room just in case you need it) while sending the Knights cantering forward on the left flank.

The Zanj weren’t moving: obviously hoping to act as a rock on which the waves of my assault would break, so I took the time they had given me to get my troops just where I wanted them.

John’s refused right flank, however, didn’t give me what I really needed: a clear path, free of ZoCs, into the side of main Zanj body of troops. It was time to try and break things up a bit: time to send in my main line.

My initial advance to contact didn’t go too well: the Alabardiers and a unit of Knights being disordered, but a quick step backwards began to open things up a bit, certainly enough to deploy one unit of my outflanking force into position.

A lot of the Zanj were on the right hand side of the table, facing air…so they ganged up on the only unit of mine that they could reach: more Knights. For once, however, the Knights did what they were supposed to do, and punched through the warriors in front of them to escape the threat.

In the right hand picture above, you can also see how John’s echelon formation was keeping my outflanking force at bay…but all I needed was one chink in the Zanj armour and I was in!

That came as my re-ordered infantry pushed forward again, leaving a lane behind them for my flanking knights to cross the entire field and crash the side of the Zanj force on the ‘empty’ side of the table: as I said, they had been advancing forward so had got out of touch with the rest of their troops.

As the Zanj line fragmented, I was now able to gang up on their individual units. What this meant was that although the Zanj warriors and most of my men fought the same way, because the Zanj (as fanatics) saved very badly, I was able to inflict significantly more hits than I took, and even deep units can’t stand forever.

Zanj warriors began streaming from the field, leaving the Venetians with a 188-23 victory (we were using Peter’s Ewelme points system): a good start to the tournament proper.

A good win, but one that left me facing a tough opponent in round two: the Spartans!

TTS AAR: Britcon Warm-Up: Venetians vs Thessalians

One of the high points of the To The Strongest calendar year has to be the Britcon tournament: with five games over two days, it is the marathon event on the competition circuit.

This year’s Britcon was going to be even busier for me than normal as I had stepped in to run the TTS event after the original organiser had had to pull out.

Tradition has it that any early birds who arrive on the Friday night can play a warm-up game with whoever else is there, so my Venetians therefore found themselves lining up opposite the Thessalians, ably commanded by Adrian, last year’s winner.

The Thessalians are quite intimidating: a command of veteran Hoplites ideal for defending against a cavalry charge, a command of meaty heavy cavalry, then all sorts of support troops including a couple of veteran Peltast and small Hoplite units. This was not going to be an easy warm up!

At this point I wasn’t sure what my plan was…but I did know that it didn’t involve letting a couple of units of enemy light cavalry sneak around my left flank almost as soon as the battle began!

Those pesky lights forced me to drop back the Knights I had on that flank, causing me to spend the first half of the game with one eye constantly on what was happening there. Definitely not good for the concentration!

Fortunately, as you can see in the right-hand picture, below, I did manage to contain Adrian’s troops there, even managing to also see off the Thessalian cavalry that had come forward in support.

Meanwhile, my Knights on the other side of the table were trying to get forward to turn the Thessalian left flank.

This, however, just wasn’t working for me, although I can’t remember why. All I do know is that my Knights there were somewhat roughly handled by some more pesky lights and the veteran Peltasts forming the end of Adrian’s main battle line, and that this allowed the Thessalian Hoplites to get into contact with my infantry.

The Knights on the right just couldn’t seem to get involved. One unit, the one with the general and army standard, languished disordered at the back of the board covered by a small unit of enemy veteran Hoplites. The other was still trying to chew their way through a unit of enemy veteran Peltasts. Not a very good performance from the Knights.

There was other fighting still going on over the rest of the battlefield, but by now my units were fighting as individual elements, not together as part of a line.

The end, as they say, was nigh…with the coup de grace being delivered as a hoard of Hoplites smashed their way into my camp, the Lights I had left there as guards proving no more than a speedbump for the Greeks, despite fighting from behind fortifications.

So a 4-13 loss for my warm-up game: not a very auspicious start to my campaign. Let’s hope the Venetians learnt some lessons for the tournament proper…!

TTS AAR: Burgundians versus Celts

As is now our usual practice, Rob and I quickly cleared away the game of For King & Parliament that we had just finished and prepared for a quick ‘dessert’ of To The Strongest.

I was about to travel to Nottingham for the TTS competition at Britcon ‘24, so was quite keen to have a practice game against an infantry-heavy army. The closest equivalent in 15mm to the Venetians (Late Italian Condotta) that I would be using at Britcon were my Burgundian Ordnance troops, so I would use them whilst Rob took the Ancient Britons: plenty of infantry with enough mounted support from chariots to make them tricky to deal with.

view from the ancient british side of the table

Theer did seem to be an awful lot of troops facing my Burgundians but, as it turned out, that was nothing to what the Venetians would face in Nottingham, but more of that in future reports…

The Ancient Brits opened proceedings with a general advance forward, but a weird series of cards meant that their warbands were immediately strung out almost in an accidental echelon formation. The Burgundians kept their nerve and moved slightly forward in a solid line.

Digressing from the centre for a second, British chariots hurtled forward on my left, seeking to curl in behind my battle line.

I dispatched a squadron of knights to deal with the threat but, much to my surprise, although they held the chariots up the knights were eventually defeated.

Thankfully the chariots never managed to get moving again after the clash (presumably looting the bodies for steel weapons, armour, heads etc) so what was an awkward situation never developed into a crisis.

Back to the centre, and the lone Ancient British warband that Rob had pushed forward was soon dispatched by my line: three against one is never good odds!

Meanwhile, my mounted crossbowmen on the right had, through a bit of luck with activation cards, managed to charge the flank of the first wave of British chariots heading towards my camp.

This allowed me to send the knights covering that side of the field forward to engage another warband: once again allowing me to use my superior fighting power to hit an enemy unit whilst avoiding being overwhelmed by weight of numbers.

With two warbands and two chariots already lost, Rob was caught between a rock and a hard place. Either he jung back and let me use my longbows and then advance to finish off any pin-cushioned survivors, or he threw everything he had left forward in an attemtp to finally break my line.

Naturally he decided to throw everything forward, and an almighty melee broke out in the centre of the field.

Unfortunately, as I said above, the troops in my main battle line were either as good as or better than his on a unit-vs-unit basis, so it was only a matter of time before just one too many warbands broke and victory was mine!

It had been a great game, and really good practice for Britcon. Lessons learnt about facing a mostly infantry army included:

  • guard your flanks

  • always try to gang up on warbands that have got separated from the main body

  • use your lights in the enemy flanks

Now all I had to do was try remember them and then put them into practice!

TTS AAR: The Beardless King Strikes Again

Having spent all that time and effort re-basing my New Kingdom Egyptians, I now wanted to get them onto the table.

No wargaming friends were available (you just can’t get the staff these days!) so I persuaded (i.e. bribed) daughter number two to put aside her computer games and face me over the tabletop. I would take the Egyptians, she elected to lead the Italo-Normans into battle.

The Italo-Normans deployed with their infantry and camp on their far right, lurking behind a couple of hills. Their knights, half of them Veterans, were in the centre of the table.

I deployed the Egyptians in the traditional way: a command of chariots on either flank with the massed infantry in the centre. My plan was, somewhat obviosuly, to sweep the chariots forward in an attempt to outflank the enemy whilst pelting them with bow-fire. Meanwhile my infantry would be a rock on which the Norman knights could dash themselves to pieces.

Well, as Mike Tyson famously said, everyone has a plan until you get a punch in the face!

I opened proceedings with, as per the plan, a major advance forward with the chariots. The cards favoured me on the right, with one command ending the turn in prime position.

The Normans responded by advancing their infantry forward onto the hills in front of their camp, sending a unit of Knights to handle my massed Light Chariots on their left wing, and an all out advance in the centre: the Beardless King saying later that her strategy was to attack, attach and then attack some more!

On the left hand side of the table, my other command of massed Light Chariots were somewhat surprised when the Norman infantry (deep Spearmen) came down off the hills and headed for them, murder in mind. Didn’t they know they are supposed to stay on their hill and get peppered with arrows until they break?

I duly retreated back before the advance, loosing arrow after arrow to not a huge effect: a pattern of activity that would be repeated until the end of the game. I would have to win elsewhere!

Meanwhile in the centre, the Normans were coming forward fast.

One unit of Knights hit the Shardana Royal Guard (the Sea Peoples types) and smashed them straight off the table!

The rest of the Knights closed with the main Egyptian infantry line.

On the right flank, the other chariots division had split their efforts. Half of them now faced the Knights that had defeated the Royal Guard, the other half (the ones down the other Norman side of the table) opened fire on the Knights that had been sent to contain them and, in due course, shot them down.

The victorious chariots then turned and headed back to the main action: let’s see how the Norman cavalry like a chariot charge in the rear!

Unfortunately, however, the Egyptian infantry line was in deep trouble and, before the chariots could intervene, just collapsed under the weight of the charges of the Norman Knights.

So that was it! The relentless charges of both the Norman knights in the centre and the Spearmen in the left had driven the New Kingdom Egyptians from the field.

The Beardless King, triumphant, slunk back to her screens!

TTS AAR: To The Longest Game Three: Venetians versus WOTR Yorkist

The afternoon game at the 2024 To The Longest event was a maga-game where everybody would fight at once. In effect, this meant eight games of To The Strongest played simultaneously, with movement of troops from one table to another allowed.

My opponent was Steve and his Wars of the Roses Yorkist army, with all its units based and painted to its historical equivalents. It was a very good looking army consisting of bows, billmen and knights: not a combination to be lightly dismissed. Terrain-wise. the left side of the battlefield was dominated by another ruined monastery, impassable to mounted troops. In addition, lunchtime rain meant that the ploughed fields that had been good going in the morning were now rough ground. The presence of the monastery determined my deployment: infantry on the left, with my Knights on the right.

The picture above was taken after the game had been going for couple of turns. On the left you’ll see Steve advancing some infantry through the monastery grounds and, on the far right, my Knights advancing forward in an attempt to turn the Yorkist left flank where, actually, the game had started quite well for me: one units of Knights managing to drive some Yorkist knights from the field.

All seemed to be going well until, that is, we each deployed our final commands (in To The Longest, you started with one command off table until the end of the first turn).

I put my final lot of Knights onto the table centre-right, where they could either re-inforce the centre or follow up on any success on the right, but Steve deployed a huge command of billmen and bowmen right opposite where my original Knights were trying to turn his flank, neatly plugging the gap at the end of his line.

The picture below shows my original Knights on the right retreating in the face of this mass of veteran infantry!

With an advance on the right now looking a tad dangerous, I switched my efforts to the left and centre.

In the centre, my newly-arrived Knights and some infantry managed to clear some light units out of the way and then punch a hole through the Yorkist line. This was good, and I now threatened the enemy camp, but there was a huge mass of Yorkist units (seven of them) on the right hand side of the table and it would not be good if they pivoted through 90 degrees and headed to their right.

I needed to keep them occupied to their front, so my main body of Knights retreated back just far enough to keep the enemy pinned in place whilst I frantically worked out how to win the game elsewhere.

On the left, my light handgunners had put themselves into pole position for the “men of the match” award by managing to drive back the enemy infantry trying to infiltrate my left through the monastery grounds. They, supported by the Lancieri (spear) and Pichierrii (pike) had actually driven the Yorkists back onto their own side of the table, even though the enemy had survived several flank attacks from the ‘gunners.

The pikemen, after their humiliation in the last game, were also on a roll, squeezing through the gap between woods and fields to drive an enemy unit from the field.

I really needed to finish the game now: my Knights were running out of retreating room on the right, and although I had cleared the enemy centre, his troops on the right were starting to do what I’d feared they might: move to their right to re-take the ground I’d taken in the middle of the field, knocking off my units there from the flank.

Taking the enemy camp would do nicely, and I had a unit of Knights in position to do that…but the camp was defended and I’d had some bad experiences in the past trying to take a fortified camp with mounted troops.

So that left the pikemen…who could take the camp with an easy move forward and then a difficult diagonal move into the undefended portion of the Yorkist camp.

I drew a card for the easy move: a “10”.

Well, they certainly were keen, but were now presumably puffing and blowing and not in the mood to go again. Or were they? Only another natural “10” would get them into the camp and win the game for the Venetians…

Lady Luck had, for a change, smiled on me and my pikemen marched neatly into the Yorkist camp costing Steve his last three coins. Victory was mine 14:5!

So a decent final game for the Venetians, although it didn’t stop the English winning the event overall.

A great day’s gaming: many thanks to Peter for organising, and to all the players, especially my three opponents.

TTS AAR: To The Longest: Game Two: Venetians versus 100YW English

My second game at the inaugral To The Longest was also against an English Hundred Years War army: more longbowmen, more stakes and more dismounted knights!

Both John, my opponent, and I kept one command of mounted knights back from the initial deployment, with both sides then bringing them onto the field on the side of the table where the ruined monastry stood: the monastry being worth extra points at the end of the game to whoever held it by having units in orthagonal base to base contact with it.

Having learnt my lesson in sending my lights forward to die in a hail of longbow fire in the last game, I decided just to advance my fighting units forward, and get them stuck in as soon as I could.

This was a sensible tactic to adopt,,,until, that is, the cards decided to really mess with my plans!

First up, my pike advancing on the left had a great opportunity to run over some longbowmen, but didn’t:

The pikes then died, costing me three coins early in the game!

Next, a command of knights attempted to charge some enemy longbowmen safely ensconsed behind rows of stakes. This was a stupid thing to try to do anyway, but a couple of aces didn’t help:

The knights would spend the next few turns uselessly smashing away at the longbowmen with neither side able to damage the other!

I was still determined to get stuck in to his melee-weak massed longbows, particularly on the left side of the field…

…but those Aces kept coming thick and fast!

By this time I had had enough. I decided on a complete change of tactics and, unusually for me, play for a draw by retreating all my troops back to my side of the field, ceasing their Ace-ridden attempts to smash their way into John’s longbow-held position.

I therefore pulled back on both the left and centre, although I did keep possession of the monastry on the right.

Now this is where the game suddenly got interesting as John, with a sudden rush of blood to the head, decided to come after me.

Firstly, the dismounted knights guarding his camp left the safety of their fortifications and came a cropper against a unit of Lancieri and my Alabardiers, who executed a second quick 180 degree turn to re-engage the enemy once they were out in the open.

Second, a unit of veteran English longbowmen attempted to re-take the monastry position from my Later Knights, who promptly remembered why they were called Later Knights and ran them over without difficulty.

Back to the left flank, where enemy longbowmen had followed their dismounted knights out of the fortified camp only to also fall foul of the Alabardiers who, it must be said, were having a very good day indeed!

This left the English camp open…my Alabardiers walked into it…and suddenly John announced he was out of coins and I had won the battle!

Well that was quite a surprise!

With possession of the monastry, I had achieved a 14-8 victory over the invading English.

I’d like to say that my tactical retreat was indeed that: a carefully planned tactic to draw John out from his position…but it wasn’t. I was genuinely determined to retreat back to my side of the field and make him come to me if he wanted anything but a draw, and was then quite surprised that I managed to turn things around as I did.

I was lucky to kill the dismounted knights on the left so easily, and John was annoyed with himself for exposing his longbowmen on the right (he’d have been okay if he’d sent the knights behind them forward instead) but what a topsy-turvily fluid game!

On to the afternoon’s big bash…

TTS AAR: To The Longest: Game One: Venetians versus 100YW English

Earlier this month I took part in the inaugral To The Longest event: a 28mm To The Strongest battle day featuring eight players aside fighting three linked games, two individual mano e mano games in the morning and one gigantic group game in the afternoon.

You can get some idea of the scale of the event by looking at the picture, opposite, that shows the table set up first thing in the morning before the game got started. As you can see, the battlefield stretched the entire length of the hall we were in, including passing through a relatively narrow partition…but more of that later.

The Hundred Years War was the theme of the day, with one side playing England, the other France. As I’m a bit short on 28mm armies, I was using my trusty, but in this case slightly anachronistic and geographically challenged, Venetians as a Late Italian Condotta army…well, it’s so hard to get work sometimes you just have to get on your bike, cross Europe and go looking for it!

My first game was against Dean, playing an English 100YW army that was the usual mixture of knights, billmen and longbowmen.

At this point it’s also worth noting that the weather was dry, and the ploughed fields still counted as good going.

My plan was to use my strong infantry command to take the walled field on my right. At the same time, my light cavalry would secure the small herd of sheep on the left (as this was the first in a series of linked games, you got extra points for securing supplies) whilst the Knights in the centre waited to see what happened.

Well, the good news was that my Stradiotti soon secured the sheep and herded them off the table to be consumed roasted with some mint sauce later on.

The less good news was that although my infantry command quickly reached the walled field on the other side of the table, they would spend the entire game bashing themselves against the troops within in, unable to make any real headway.

The battle would therefore be decided mainly in the centre of the field, where both sides moved their “heavies” into position for a fight.

My plan was working: with so much of Dean’s army concentrated on his wings, I effectively had five fighting units versus his three, giving me the advantage.

It would have been six versus three except for the fact that one unit of knights stubbornly refused to move away from the Italian camp (you can see them bottom left in the picture, above) wasting vast amounts of time and initiative as I tried to get them into the fray.

Worse, my other Knights were having one of their off days: failing to smite the enemy from the field with their initial charges.

The grinding combat in the centre gradually worked its way through, with honours ending up about even.

I lost a unit of Knights to English dismounted knights but had some Lancierii all ready to take advantage of where the victorious enemy knights ended up, but luck was on the side of the English and this pivotal moment to flank charge King Henry passed without result.

I had another chance to smash through the enemy line when some more of my Knights ended a unit of English billmen.

This could have meant the opportunity to roll the English up, but Dean cunningly withdrew his vulnerable units into a defensive position in the top left of the field, meaning that my Knights now faced nothing but a row of longbowmen rather than the flanks and rear of retreating billmen.

By this time my Venetians were also getting a little tired and emotional!

Dean had gradually been knocking off my light units which, whilst individually unimportant, collectively mounted up to a significant amount of coins.

Add to this King Henry’s unit turning and polishing off the Lancierii and I had lost too many to recover from. Excellent play from Dean meant a bad start to the day with a 6-14 defeat for the Venetians!

TTS AAR: To The Smallest Game 4: Timurids vs Sassanid Persians

My final game at this year’s To The Smallest 15mm tournament was against another Sassanid army: this one commanded by Michael L, with the tabletop being a representation of the WOTR battle of Towton…fortunately without the snow storm!

For a change, I won the scouting, and watched as Michael deployed his men with their right flank anchored on the small stream that crossed the battlefield. This gave me the opportunity to deploy one of my commands on my far left, with my plan being to advance them forward and hit Michael in the flank as I held my main line back. There was also the prospect of taking the Sassanid camp, which didn’t look very defended to me.

I did see some elephants on the left of Michael’s line, so was determined not to close with them, instead shooting the pachys with lots of arrows…once bitten, twice shy for those who have read my previous reports from this competition!

As the battle began, I advanced quickly forward on the left, although progress was a bit stymied by the cards that first of all split my heavies from my lights and then prevented me getting into my outflanking position as quickly as I wanted to.

Meanwhile, I held most of my line back, just sending the lighst forward to harrass the Sassanids in the centre and on the left.

Spotting my intentions, Michael advanced forward as fast as he could, and soon things were posed for a massive clash in the centre of the field.

I say posed for the massive clash, but tht never really happened as, sticking to my plan, I carried out a bit of a strategic hang-back or withdrawal, limiting my exposure to melee as much as I could.

It’s worth mentioning that Michael had committed quite a strong force to his far left, presumably intending to try and curl around my right flank, but this force was delayed by just two of my light cavalry units (Turkoman horse archers), who kept them occupied and therefore out of the main action for several turns.

The final picture in the gallery, below, shows one Sassanid unit finally managing to get across to the centre to attack the flank of one of my Timurid lancer units.

All the above, however, was just a distraction for me: my main thrust was down the left flank. Theere a combination of my heavy cavalry, kharash driven slaves and the force on the other side of the stream had launched a series of succesful attacks that had put me into a game-winning position:

All this manoeuvring around had, however, been using up valuable time and, at this point, despite Michael and I’s best efforts to bring the game to a firm conclusion, we had to finish.

I had done enough to achieve a 9-2 winning draw, but just another 15-30 minutes would, we were both sure, have resulted in victory…but it was still a great game fought in the best of spirits. I also think it’s fair to say that Michael did suffer from several appalling run of cards during the game!

So how did I do overall? Well, with one loss, one losing draw and two winning draws, my Timurids managed 12th position from a field of, I think, 18. Disappointing, but it had still been a cracking tournament that I have already diarised for next year.

The Other Side of the Hill

Michael also wrote this battle up on the To The Strongest Facebook Group. I wroye my report independently of his, so interesting to compare the two…!

Here it is then, the final report of my (mis)adventures in the To the Smallest Competition run superbly by the great Sid Ben.

My fourth attempt to win a battle foundered against Robert Avery’s lovely looking Timurid Army. We fought on the battlefield of Towton, an odd place to find both the Sassanians and Tamerlane the Great.

As usual I was outscouted. In my second and third games I had been irritated by catching the palm trees on one of my camps with my sleeve, so seeing all the trees on the Timurid side of Cock Beck (yes I looked it up and it’s too good to omit) I decided to repeat the example of my first battle and place my camps adjacent to Cock Beck. All was fine until Rob deployed his last command amongst all those woods with the dastardly intent to grab my camps! Yet another error which was compounded by my deploying the Levy (the camp was in their command unfortunately) to protect it so my least manoeuvrable troops would have to fight off Cavalry and light horse.

Never mind I could win the battle elsewhere against Rob’s sadly diminished forces, couldn’t I? Well I could dream. Purandokhr got forward on my left but was detained for far too long disposing of some Turkomans. The Elephants trundled forward but the Timurid horse, in the main, skipped away neatly. We did catch one unit at the end with the assistance of some horse archers sent over by Purandokhr.

However the main effort was to be made by Shapur. This hope was very short lived as one unit of Cataphracts was soon lost, the other, with Shapur himself, was disordered and any thought of attacking the enemy was gone only desperate thoughts of preserving what was left until Purandokhr came up.

Well despite some poor cards the Turkoman light horse seized my camps. I could barely get the Levy turned to face the threat before the enemy was upon them. However the Levy proved sturdier than I had expected though poor cards prevented Rob making heavier attacks upon them. He was attracted (or was that distracted?) by the six further medals they represented.

With Shapur’s men falling back, time was called leaving me with a loss of 8 medals (I think) out of 15 while I believe Rob had lost 4 though I may be wrong there. Regardless of the score it was a sound drubbing from a most sporting and friendly opponent. Though galling to make such a mess of it, it was a good finish to a thoroughly enjoyable day. It only remained to hear if I was in with a chance to “win” the Wooden Spoon (actually the “Mouse that Roared!” As it transpired I couldn’t even win that!

Thanks once again to Sid and all the other gamers who made it a special day. Thank you one and all.

Here’s the gallery of Michael’s images: all the pictures have captions describing the course of the battle, so be sure to check them out…

Phew! Pretty similar if you ask me!

TTS AAR: To The Smallest Game 3: Timurids vs Neo Assyrians

My third game at the 2024 Tio The Smallest competition at Firestorm Games in Cardiff was against Michael’s Neo-Assyrians. The action would take place on the Thermopylae table i.e. a narrow-ish stretch of open ground flanked by the sea on one side and mountains on the other.

I forget who won the scouting, but the two armies set up very differently indeed. Michael, cautious of all my cavalry, squeezed his troops into one corner, whereas I, looking for that outflanking opportunity, occupied the other!

My plan was fairly obvious: advance forward strongly and curl around the Assyrians’ left flank, forcing them to fight to the front and sides at the same time.

For their part, the Assyrians stayed squeezed into their corner, which suited me down to the ground…although I was finding my cavalry weren’t advancing forward quite as fast as I wanted them too: the Assyrians had too much time to prepare for my assualt!

Finally I was in position to attack, but the delay had given Michael enough time to skillfully position his men in a defensive ring, making good use of the patches of rough ground to protect his flanks.

The first round of my attacks went in on the Assyrian flank with a collosal assault that swept the first line of Michael’s defence aside, forcing him to send his second line in to hold the Timurids back.

Meanwhile, a unit of kharash driven slaves probed the ‘corner’ of the Assyrian position and, much to everyon’e surprise, managed to send a unit of enemy infantry routing from the field.

The Assyrians, however, quickly recovered their balance, moving the last of their reserves to block the potential incursion.

Unfortunately, the clock was ticking onwards, and as the morning’s games had taken slightly longer than expected, the game’s slightly curtailed allocation of time was now coming to an end.

The Timurids smashed forward one more time, but just couldn’t break through the Assyrian lines.

With the game now ended, we totted up the victory medals: the Timurids might have sent quite a few Assyrian units fleeing from the field, but it had been an expensive business in terms of casaulties to do so.

In the end, the game was a winning draw in the Timurids’ favour: ten medals to nine i.e. the very narrowest of margins!

Michael had mounted a superb defence against my Timurids, and had come within Ames Ace of taking the result. A great game that had exhausted all involved!

TTS AAR: To The Smallest Game 1: Timurids vs Classical Indians

Earlier in June, I made the long journey to the excellent Firestorm Games in Cardiff for the inaugral To The Smallest competition i.e. a To The Strongest tournament played in 15mm.

This featured 160 point armies (15-20% larger than the usual 28mm tournament armies) played on a 10mm rather than a 15mm grid, giving everybody much more room to manouevre.

My problem was that all my existing armies were set up for a 15mm grid, so the only army that I could easily convert (i.e. no re-basing, just purpose built movement trays) were my Timurids. This wasn’t actually a problem: the Timurids conquered quite a bit of the world, so were bound to do well in competition!

My first game was up against Matt Slade’s Classical Indians on the Khadesh battlefield: so at least my horsemen would indeed have lots of room.

My plan was to keep his heavy chariot strikeforce busy with one of my cavalry commands whilst sweeping around his right flank with the other, attacking from front and sides to get the advantage.

As the game began, I therefore advanced strongly towards the Indians.

On the left, I quickly got in amongst it with one of his commands, although the elephants there caused my cavalry plenty of problems (in TTS, horse fight very badly against nellies); whilst on the right, I hung back and began peppering his charioteers with arrows, unfortunately to no effect.

Unfortunately, I just couldn’t break through on the right (fighting elephants with cavalry was one reason - I just couldn’t kill that elephant no matter what I threw at it) but Matt’s heavy chariots burst through my light cavalry screen and then my heavy cavalry as well.

Things were not looking good!

I needed to do something to break through on the left, so committed my reserves: the kharash units of driven-slaves. Here you see them moving up into action (bottom left).

The kharash c-rashed into the fight and, combined with some heavy cavalry, knocked an Indian infantry unit out of action. I was whittling his forces down on the left, but two units of elephants were still giving me problems.

Meanwhile, on the left, my troops had given up the ghost, leaving the way clear for his chariots to head for my now-undefended camps.

Which then promptly fell, giving Matt all the coins he could possibly need to win the game!

The score was a 9-14 loss for me, with Matt justly rewarded for his good play: his use of elephants to de-fang my heavy cavalry was excellent. I should have hung back and peppered the pachyderms with arrows instead of mixing it in melee!

Three games to go…and my Timurids had better pull their socks up!

TTS AAR: Classical Indians versus Burgundian Ordnance

As our ECW game had finished quite quickly, friend Rob and I decided to extend our gaming session with a quick bout of To The Strongest.

It wasn’t exactly a historical match-up - Classical Indians with their javelinmen and chariots vs Burgundian Ordnance with their Later Knights - but at least both sides had plenty of longbows to hand!

[For those of you looking for the heavy chariots, I was actually using a Republican Classical Indian army using standard chariots.]

Both sides opened the game by sprinting towards each other, keen to get into contact.

The Burgundians had advanced a unit of mounted infantry onto the hill to the right of my line. It looked a bit isolated to me, so a good target for my chariots and cavalry.

This worked very nciely, with my two mounted units combining to overwhelm the Burgundian foot from front and flank.

Rob followed up with one of his Later Knights units, charging forward to engage my javelinmen whilst some mounted crossbowmen kept the victorious chariots busy.

One unit of Later Knights versus four units of javelinmen, so I was confident that I could do the same again: overwhelm an isolated unit. I even got the initiative and sent my brave infantry in against the Knights.

Now some of you will know that I often feel that the cards are, quite frankly, against me; and I am sure that some of you think I should stop being wet and just get on with things: after all, luck is always even…

Add in a series of unfortunate morale checks and it’s a case of now you see them, now you don’t:

So that was eight victory medals gone up in smoke, my only consolation being that his Knights tried the same trick on the last remaining unit of javelinmen and got sent flying.

Phew! I might have lost the flank, but at least it was safe and I had a unit of cavalry keen to visit the enemy camps!

Meanwhile the rest of my army had advanced into contact with the Burgundian centre and right wing.

I had high hopes here: my escorted elephants were rock hard (even if Rob did manage to avoid hitting them with cavalry (who get a huge penalty for the effects that the nellies have on horses)) and accompanied by the equally tough Maiden Guard.

I also had my left wing in action: managing to outflank another units of his Knights:

My central command did its job: two of Rob’s units destroyed for no loss:

Both the Indians and Burgundians were now down to very few medals indeed, which meant that the battle would go to the next side that knocked an enemy unit from the field.

Luckily, I had my chariots still around in the centre of the field, now faced by only a lone unit of Burgundian organ guns. These were swiftly swept from the table, which caused the enemy general sheltering behind them to go as well, giving me enough victory coins to win the day!

So a narrow victory for the Indians over a very tough opponent…not that there were many of my men left to celebrate!

Timurids at Vanquish...Part Two

With the first game such a disaster for the Timruids, I was keen to ‘get back on the horse’ and try my luck again against the Early Byzantines.

For this game, as it was supposed to be a participation/demonstration event, we had a brand new player join the table, so he (with a bit of help) would face me.

The calm before the storm

As you can see in the picture, above, this time I adopted a more traditional deployment: infantry in the centre, with my cavalry on the wings. My plan ws obviously to outflank on the left, and roll up his line to the right.

The two sides quickly headed towards each other, with my plan to conquer all on the left starting to unfold.

The plan unfolds

Unfortunately, the cards had other ideas and my flanking manouevre failed dismally!

Flanking force stymied by an Ace

This left me very vulnerable to the fire from his mass auxiliaries with bows, and soon our new companion was drawing 8s, 9s and 10s from his deck to shoot my heavy cavalry straight off the field.

I’ve never seen cards like it. Usually shooting is more of a nuisance than a threat, but here my opponent drew so many high cards that we calculated that there were only four 8s, 9s or 10s left in the deck, whereupon he promptly drew two 8s for his next two shots!

For my units in the center and right of the table, it really was a case of “now you see them, now you don’t”!

My flanking force on the left had now started to arrive, but it was too late to make a difference. One more ‘twang’ of enemy bows, and the last of my coins left the table!

All that was left was on the left!

So that was Vanquish: an excellent little show but with a decidedly sub-optimale performance from the Timurids.

Let’s hope this weekend’s inaugural To The Smallest goes better!

Timurid's at Vanquish...Part One

I had another opportunity to practice for To The Smallest at this year’s Vanquish show in Bourne End, as friends of mine from SOGS were putting on a TTS demo game.

I only arrived at lunchtime, but we still managed to find time for two games: both would involve my Timurids fighting a force of Early Byzantines.

In the first game, my plan was to stack my infantry on the right, then head forward with them as fast as possible before turning to roll the Bysantines up from the flank. You can see the first moves in the picture above.

This worked really well, and had the added advantage of keeping my troops away from his rather nasty extra-bow-armed auxiliary-types in the centre.

My flanking force got into the perfect position, and turned to begin the rollup. Surely nothing could stop me now!

Well you’d think that, wouldn’t you!

Unfortunately the cards deserted me in a big way, and my perfectly positioned flanking force just wouldn’t get moving or, when they did, achieved almost nothing.

Meanwhile, in the centre, his largely-raw auxiliaries suddenly developed backbones and just wouldn’t break despite the attentions of my heavy, half-veteran cavalry. In fact, rather than fleeing from the field as they should, it was my horse that ran away!

Nothing was going right for me, and with the last of my victory medals handed over to my opponent, the game was lost!

A 2-14 defeat that boded ill for my chances in Wales!

TTS AAR: Timurids vs Sassanid Persian - The Re-Match

As we still had plenty of time after the last battle, we decided to have a straight re-match.

This time our Timurids decided on a more sensible deployment: infantry in the middle, cavalry on the wings.

Neither side had any interest in shilly-shallying around, so headed for the opposition as fast their feet/hooves could carry them.

The first clash was on the left wing, where a brigade of Timurid cavalry crashed into a brigade of Sassanid cataphract horse.

Things did not go well for the Timurids: losing the whole brigade apart from the veteran heavy cavalry…and even they were forced to retreat back to the Timurid camp, horse-tails between their legs!

With the left flank thoroughly lost, it was time to look to the centre and right for success.

As the two battle lines came together, fierce melees broke out on the left-centre (kharash driven slaves versus Persian Savaran) and right-centre (a Timurid cavalry brigade commanded by Steve against some more Savaran supported by lights) but, in the centre-centre, Timur-the-Lame himself, at the head of some veteran cavalry, punched through the enemy troops in front of him.

Never one to miss an opportunity for death and destruction, Timur then executed a smart left turn and headed into the flanks of the Persian horse who had begun to beat back the kharash.

This was initially very successful, knocking a couple of light units from the field, but the Persian Savaran hit in the flank survived the impact and then, using one of theose rules that make you go “are you George Bernard?”, fell back two squares and then moved forward again to threaten Timur’s flank and the seven victory medals he represents!

Meanwhile, on the right, the Timurid cavalry had been doing stirling work removing Persian cavalry from the field:

By this time, the Persians were down to one victory medal, but the Timurids were damaged as well (all those units lots on the left flank) and, if the Persians got another turn and took out Timur, we were in danger of losing the game despite the fact that everything seemed to be going our way.

Worse, the Persian force that had defeated me on the left had swung round and were now heading rapidly back towards the centre. We really had to win now…but where to get that elusive last victory medal from?

Perhaps you remember the Timurid veteran cavalry that had fled to their camp?

Well they were still lurking in the camp…and some Sassanid light horse had strayed within range of their bows. I drew my first activation card and: Ace!

Okay, no matter, there’s a general present, so I can re-draw: this time a “2”.

A hail of arrows headed towards the enemy light and, unbelievably, scored a hit which the lights failed to save. Victory was ours again, but it had been a much closer game, finishing 13-7.

TTS AAR: Timurids vs Sassanid Persians

This June sees the inaugral 15mm To The Strongest competition, “To The Smallest” at Firestorm Games in Cardiff. The competition will be played on a large 10mm grid: the idea being to give it a significantly different feel to a standard 28mm game played on a 12x8 grid.

Always best to have a practice at a new format, so Si, Steve, John, Bevan and I gathered together to give it a go. Our first game was to be Steve and I playing the Timurids versus the others playing the Sassanid Persians.

The Timurids ahd four commands, three cavalry and one infantry, which, for some reason, ended up on the far right of our line. I’m not sure why: any cunning plan that we had for what to do with them has since escaped me!

The centre of the Sassanid line comprised multiple units of cataphracts, so as the game began I sent the Timurid lance-armed heavy cavalry right at them: the idea being to fire our bows on the approach to disorder and then charge in to polish them off.

Unbelievably, this worked really well, and one unit of lancers punched straight through the Sassnanid line, cataphracts flying everywhere, and ended up in a great position to threaten the enemy camps.

Meanwhile on the left, two units of Timurid heavies and two units of Timurid lights faced off against an almost identical configuration of Sassanid horse, the only (but key) difference being that my units were in a single, tightly-bunched command rather than slightly spread out.

This meant that when things went wrong - my veteran heavies going unexpectedly disordered - I had the troops available to protect them as they withdrew to rally, with the protectors, another heavy cavalry unit, actually smashing the enemy cavalry from the field. With my veterans rallied and on their was back into the fight, the left wing was now looking good.

The key unit in the pictures above is the Timurid cavalry with the blue flag bottom left in the image on the left and almost exactly in the centre of the image on the right: they smashed the Sassanid Savaran cavalry off the table before they could charge the rear of my veterans, reversing what looked like it was going to be a reverse!

On the right, the infantry there had yet to achieve much of anything, although they were keeping a couple of enemy cavalry units occupied and therefore away from the action in the centre.

Meanwhile, the Timurids were pouring through the Sassanid centre.

And had totally polished off the Sassanids on the left:

Back to the centre, and my veteran heavies moved into the enemy camp, reducing the Sassanids to just one medal remaining. They weren’t totally beaten, however, and a nasty moment ensured when my CinC’s unit (i.e. veteran heavies with Brilliant General and Army Standard - worth seven coins) was almost smashed from the table, fortunately making a vital save just at the right time.

A moment later, a Sassanid light unit was either KO’d or forced to evade off the table and the game was ours for a 13-3 victory.

So a decent victory for the Timurids…although it has to be said that the cards were running for us throughout the game.

As for the 15mm/10cm squares experience: not much change for me, as I usually play on a 15cm grid on a much bigger area than a standard competition table, but the others found it a significant change to what they are used to. Roll on the To The Smallest competition!

TTS AAR: Venetians Abroad vs Later Crusader (Ewelme 24: Game Four)

My final game at the 2024 Ewelme tournament was against Rob’s Later Crusader army. This was an army reasonably similar to mine: strong cavalry backed up by bog standard infantry, although my Knights were slightly better than his horse, and his infantry all had crossbows.

My plan was not especially subtle: use my superior cavalry to win the wings whilst my infantry held the centre, then curl in and roll the Crusaders up from both flanks. Accordingly, I advanced my two brigades of Knights and Lights rapidly towards the enemy.

On the left flank, it proved quite hard to get through his Crusader Knights. I lost a unit of “Broken Lances” shortly after the first clash and had to send some spearmen in for support.

Although things eventually began turning my way, it took all five of my units (two Knights, two Lights and the Spearmen) to get the advantage on his two units of Crusader Knights and some infantry. The battle was not going to be won on the left!

On the right, however, things went much better for the Venetians.

A rapid advance with some Knights and light horse actually worked brilliantly with, for once in the whole tournament, my ‘veteran Knights’ and ‘veteran Later Knights with Army Standard’ actually doing what they were supposed to do: smashing enemy units from the field with abandon whilst proving impervious to attacks from the flanks and rear.

In fact, it’s so unusual for my Later Knights and Knights to actually survive a combat despite their 4+ and 5+ saves respectively, that it’s worth another picture:

By now the Crusaders were beginning to fold, with both flanks under extreme pressure from my surviving Knights.

A final couple of Crusader units gave way, and the game was mine: a hard-fought win 183 points to 67 points (12-8 in terms of victory medals).

So that was the last game, and I had amassed one huge loss, one losing draw, one big win, and the win against the Crusaders, above.

The points were totted up and I had managed 5th place: a lot better than I had expected given my first two games.

It had been an excellent day’s play against three great opponents, and I cannot but recommend the To The Strongest competition circuit to all. Although there are competitions before then, the biggie this year is the two-day Britcon event (well, it’s three days if you count the Friday evening as well) with five games (six if you count Friday’s warm-up) over two days.

Entries are open now.

TTS AAR: Venetians Abroad vs Granadine (Ewelme 24: Game Three)

My third game at this year’s Ewelme competition was against Steve’s Granadines: one of the Moorish dynasties established in Spain 1200-1500.

The great thing about fighting the Granadines was that Steve’s army was almost wholly comprised of shieldwall infantry, lights and missile troops: with only up to two units of Knights that might give my men pause for thought before getting stuck in i.e. provided I protected my flanks, I should be able to beat him on a pure unit-by-unit match up.

My tactics, therefore, would be simple: advance swiftly towards the enemy and engage his troops as soon as possible, just going for a quick win by bashing his lesser units off the table as fast as I could! I therefore determined to use my first turn to group move forward each of my three commands with no shilly-shallying around.

Naturally, however, the cards had different plans:

This was, however, only a temporary setback, and soon my men were right on top of the Moors, with Steve’s cards preventing him from countering my advance by also getting in on the ‘double Aces’ act:

After that, however, things went very much to plan: my Knights proved just about unstoppable, and my Alabadiers also showed how good they could be against standard infantry.

In the end my predictions about how the battle would go came true: wherever I could get my men stuck in, the enemy crumbled, so as long as I kept the initiative and forced Steve to respond to my attacks as opposed to being able to manoeuvre and launch any of his own, the game was mine.

The eventual result was a 192:17 victory (13 coins to 2 coins), with my only casualties being a couple of units of Lights.

So three games out of four done: one big loss countered by one big win, and a losing draw on the scoreboard: I needed a good result in game four to save the day!

TTS AAR: Venetians Abroad vs Later Swiss (Ewelme 24: Game Two)

After losing so badly to Peter’s Later Tibetans in Game One, it was inevitable that my second game would also be a tough one…facing Dillon’s Later Swiss, to whom I’d lost my first game at the Roll Call competition.

At least I knew what to expect and, sure enough, the Swiss shot forward, determined to get their massive four-hit pike blocks into action as soon as possible.

My only chance was to somehow stem the tide of the Swiss advance and then manouevre around their flanks and rear: something I had failed to do last battle.

The opening moves were therefore very much me trying to get behind what terrain their was, block the Swiss advance as best I could, and get my Knights and Lights into the lanes between the advancing pike blocks.

Although stopping the pike blocks proved problematic, I was helped by Dillon’s cards and, as the game unfolded, looked to try and roll him up left to right.

I also managed to get my best unit (veteran Later Knights, Lance, Hero, General, Army Standard) through his lines, all ready to turn and crash into his men from behind when…

Well that was somewhat frustrating…especially as that proved to be the highpoint of the Venetian game!

The battle settled down into a series of grinding melees with neither side getting an advantage, except for the fact that the Swiss were gradually getting closer and closer to my camp.

At this point we unfortunately ran out of time, with my troops suffering a 42-105 losing draw (three medals vs eight medals) which, to look on the bright side, was better than they did against the Swiss last time!

Two games in and a big loss and a losing draw to my name: things were not looking good!

TTS AAR: Venetians Abroad vs Later Tibetans (Ewelme 24, Game One)

This year’s Ewelme tournament was themed For England and St George: later armies from the Medieval lists and one of your generals had an extra hero who could be activated by crying that phrase or one more suited to your army.

My first game was against Peter’s Later Tibetans.

This was extremely amusing as in the run up to the draw for the first round games (televised by Peter and the team from SOGS) I had answered the question “what sort of army would you least like to face” with the slightly facetious “anything commanded by Peter”. Naturally Lady Luck was listening in and, sure enough, out came Peter’s chit swiftly followed by mine! It was going to be a long day!

The Tibetans, being nearly all on horseback, outscouted my holidaying Venetians, with the result that once again I found myself facing an army that was heavily weighted to one flank.

The Tibetan “Peace Mountain” can be seen top left!

I was absolutely determined not to be outflanked, so hung back my right whilst strongly advancing my left.

Unfortunately this made very little difference, and soon I was facing light horse and cataphracts threatening my right flank.

I pondered what to do for some time, then attempted to consolidate my position.

Unfortunately I left the smallest of chinks in my armour and, before I knew it, I had cataphracts pouring in from the right, smashing my units from the table faster than you can say nam myoho renge kyo!

Note that this meant that the yellow cataphracts had to successfully turn and move one forward (difficult move) then move diagonally and charge (another difficult move).

My centre then collapsed under the wright of more flank charges as the Tibetans poured in from the right, and nothing I tried to do seemed to work.

A rather ignominius defeat 17:192 points!

Superb play from Peter, poor play from me. I should have compressed my troops into one corner, formed a wall of spearmen, some in orbis, and used my Knights effectively rather than seeing them smashed from the table without even getting to use their lances.

Not a good start to the day!

TTS AAR: Venetians Abroad versus Catalan Company (Roll Call Game Four)

My final game at Roll Call this year was against Dene’s Catalan Company: an army consisting of Almughavar javelinmen supported by cavalry, allied light horse and Greek archers.

The Catalans had outscouted my Venetians and came forward rapidly in a ragged line.

As both sides had their horse on the same side of the field, the first clash came on my right, where my Knights clashed with Dene’s. Both sides lost a unit but the advantage in positioning was slightly in my favour.

In the centre, more of my Knights punched through the horse in front of them, with the decision now being how to take on the enemy’s central command of formed infantry happily ensconced on a couple of hills.

Back on the right hand side of the field, my Knights finished clearing the enemy cavalry away, leaving them clear to advance but a long way from the rest of the action.

Unfortunately, however, things weren’t going so well on the other side of the table. My infantry had definitely come off worse in the initial clash, not helped by the fact that my Halbardiers just couldn’t get the cards they needed to activate let alone fight…although they did stand heroically solid when attacked on the flank (top middle in the second picture, below).

My camp was now exposed, however, with Dene quite happy to take one half whilst threatening the other: things were critical as that represented an awful lot of Victory Medals.

We were just about to start another turn - a turn in which Dene had a good chance of taking the game, despite the success of my Knights on the right - when time was called: all the manouevring early in the game had used up the clock!

A very narrow escape for the Venetians: a losing draw 7:9.

What was worse (for Dene) was that not finishing off my Venetians meant that I pipped him at the post for the third place position, with him finishing fourth only a few points behind me!

All in all, a great day’s gaming: well done to Tim for organising, and to all the other players in competing in the usual TTS good humour and sportsmanship.

As for my Venetians, they will now continue their journey Abroad with a trip to historic Ewelme and the “England and St George” competition there.